For Immediate Release
October 13, 2004 |
Media Contact:
Michelle Ringuette
+1 (202) 986 6093;
+1 (202) 550 1321 |
Catholics for a Free Choice Files IRS Complaint Against Priests
for Life
Antichoice organization misleads public with
claims of nonpartisan voter education efforts as it attempts to influence
election outcome.
Statement of Frances Kissling,
President, Catholics for a Free Choice
Washington, DC—As the 2004 election draws near, certain charitable
organizations are flouting their tax exempt status in their attempts
to influence the outcome. Groups such as Catholic Answers, Inc. and
the Culture of Life Foundation have dismissed the legal parameters
of their 501(c)(3) incorporation to push voters; a handful of Catholic
bishops have issued coded and less coded instructions to Catholics
regarding candidates for office; and just this week, Bishop Charles
Chaput of Denver capped off his election year strategy with a thinly
veiled endorsement of the president.
Today, Catholics for a Free Choice filed a complaint with the Internal
Revenue Service against the Priests for Life, an antichoice organization
comprised of only 13 percent of the nation’s 47,200 Catholic
priests, according to their 2000 membership information. Priests for
Life has cloaked itself in language suggesting that all of its election-related
efforts are permissible nonpartisan voter registration, Get Out The
Vote organizing and voter education efforts, despite strong evidence
to the contrary.
On September 23, 2004, Priests for Life demonstrated flagrant abuse
of its 501(c)(3) status that prohibits certain electoral activity when
it promised to launch a million-dollar educational campaign in the
final 30 days prior to the November 2 election. It described this effort
as “aimed primarily at church-going Christians, who, according
to the polls, favor pro-life candidates.” By targeting a particular
group for a Get Out The Vote effort in favor of particular candidates,
Priests for Life engaged in an established example of illegal partisan
efforts.
The “Election Action Center” on the Priests for Life website
offers “Legal Guidelines for What to Do in the Parish,” which
includes links to IRS Publication 1828, opinion letters from counsel
on particular activities and other resources. However, the organization’s
true and surreptitious campaign interventions cannot be so easily masked.
In a message on the Priests for Life website, Father Frank Pavone,
the organization’s national director, urges readers to print
and distribute a brochure entitled “You Wouldn’t Even Ask” in
which he states:
“Any candidate who says abortion should be kept legal disqualifies
him/herself from public service. We need look no further, we need pay
no attention to what that candidate says on other issues. Support for
abortion is enough for us to decide not to vote for such a person.”
Father Pavone echoes this sentiment in his public appearances on behalf
of Priests for Life. For example, Father Pavone told an audience in
Green Bay, Wisconsin, “vote for candidates who oppose abortion,
or at least for those who oppose it more than others.”
Likewise, Priests for Life urges those who share its political ideology
to download and use the web banner ads that Priests for Life has produced
and makes available on its website. These banner ads read: “November
2nd Elections: You can help elect pro-life candidates. Find out how” and
then offer a link to the election page on the Priests for Life website.
The Priests for Life website makes the organization’s partisan
purpose even clearer. In a section of the website purporting to offer
501(c)(3)-appropriate education on the positions of the candidates, Priests
for Life offers a link to partisan voter guides produced by the 501(c)(4)
National Right to Life Committee and the guide produced by the political
action committee We Vote Pro-Life PAC. No similar links are made available
to organizations with opposing views on abortion. As the IRS has made
clear, a 501(c)(3) may not distribute voter education material prepared
by a PAC because “such material is prepared and distributed for
the purpose of improving or diminishing a candidate’s prospects
to be elected.”
The IRS has made it clear that a 501(c)(3) may not propose such a litmus
test against which voters should measure candidates. The problem, the
IRS has said, is a 501(c)(3) communication that “invites its audience
to compare a candidate’s positions with the organization’s
own views.” The Priests for Life brochure, the banner ads and Father
Pavone’s statements on behalf of the organization are clear examples
of such prohibited activity.
It is unacceptable for any organization
to reap tax benefits for a charitable mission and then use resources
to engage in illegal political
work. Charitable status is a privilege, not a right. Organizations
are free to educate their members and the public, but must do so
within the
legal limits of their charitable status. Organizations even have
the right to participate in the election process if they choose to renounce
their
charitable status. What they are not free to do is flout the federal
statutes and IRS regulations that govern all charities by endorsing
or targeting
candidates during an election year.
CFFC has asked the IRS to take swift
action given Priests for Life’s
threat to expand its illegal activities before the election. We call
on the IRS to consider revoking the tax-exempt status of this and any
other
organization that violates the law.
###
Catholics for a Free Choice is a non-partisan organization. We do
not support or oppose candidates for public office. CFFC shapes and
advances
sexual and reproductive ethics that are based on justice, reflect a
commitment to women’s well being, and respect and affirm the moral
capacity of women and men to make sound decisions about their lives.
Through discourse,
education, and advocacy, CFFC works in the US and internationally to
infuse these values into public policy, community life, feminist analysis,
and
Catholic social thinking and teaching.